Judges say council’s legal challenge over a disabled teenager’s residential school placement was pointless after she had already settled there.
A council’s attempt to overturn a ruling requiring it to fund residential special needs education for a disabled teenager has been dismissed by the Court of Appeal.
The case focused on AA, a 17-year-old with profound and multiple learning difficulties. She has a chromosomal abnormality and global development delay, cannot speak and depends on adults for her care.
In 2023, Hillingdon Council and AA’s parents disagreed over where she should go to school. Her parents argued she needed a residential placement with education beyond the normal school day. But, the local authority questioned this, saying a non-residential school would meet her needs at lower cost to the taxpayer.
A specialist tribunal ruled in favour of the parents. It said AA needed an extended day and residential care and named Eliot School in her Education, Health and Care Plan.
Hillingdon Council challenged the ruling twice – first to the Upper Tribunal, then to the Court of Appeal.
However, by the time the case was heard in February 2026, AA had already been at Eliot School for more than a year. Lawyers for the council accepted she was doing well there and said there were no plans to move her.
Even the council’s own barrister accepted that winning the appeal would not change anything on the ground. The council had not found any alternative provision, and could not show that AA’s needs could be met other than residentially.
Dismissing the case, Lord Justice Cobb said it was now ‘academic’. He said: ‘No order or declaration made by this court would be of any real practical benefit to the parties.’
He added the case did not raise issues of wider public interest significant enough to justify hearing it anyway. And crucially, the parents – who would have had to defend the appeal – did not agree to it proceeding.
Lord Justice Cobb added: ‘It is a matter of regret that the local authority elected to devote limited resources to pursuing an appeal to this court which has, ultimately, yielded no substantive benefit.’
The decision means the original tribunal ruling remains in place and AA will stay at Eliot School. Her case will be reviewed again in January 2027 as part of the normal process.
Image: Element5 Digital/UnSplash
In related news:
Bromley’s trafficking concerns vindicated in adoption battle
Leave a Reply